## Observing Barnard’s Star

by Robert J. Vanderbei

Barnard’s Star is one of the closest stars to us. It is also the star that has the fastest apparent motion across the sky moving about 11 arcseconds per year. With a right ascension of 17h 53m 26s, it reaches opposition on the night of the summer solstice: June 21st.

Over the course of 15 months, I took three pictures of Barnard’s star: (i) on 2012-06-21, (ii) on 2013-06-06, (iii) and on 2013-09-05. The September image is shown in Figure 1.

On each of the three nights, roughly 150 images were taken. Each image was an unguided 8-second exposure. For each night, the best of the images were selected and stacked to make a master image for the night. To maintain astrometric precision, the stacked images were saved in IEEE-float-format fits files. Then, using MaximDL, the three images were aligned to each other using the background stars for the alignment. In the aligned images, the centroid of Barnard’s Star was measured to subpixel level. The centroids so measured turned out to be:

The three stacked and aligned images were then combined with each other to show in one image the relative motion of Barnard’s Star. A closely cropped version of this final stack is shown in Figure 2. Clearly, the proper motion is mainly a north-to-south motion. But, the third image is noticeably off the line that passes through the first two images. Its leftward displacement is due to the oscillatory east-west motion caused by the fact that our Earth is orbiting the Sun. In other words, any east-west displacement is due to parallax. I’ve overlayed on the figure the best-fit proper-motion/parallax path. To find this best sinusoidal path, I started by writing down the general equation for such a path. It turns out to have six free parameters. Matching the x and y coordinates at the three time epochs to the general equation produced six equations. Solving the six equations in six unknowns I was able to determine both the parallax and the proper motion (as well the other four free parameters).

Initially, these quantities were determined in pixel units but I already knew that my telescope/camera combination produces images in which each pixel is 0.575 arcseconds on a side. Converting from pixels to arcseconds, I arrived at my final answer:

Parallax of Barnard’s Star =0.635 arcseconds.

Fig. 1.— A stack of the best 120 out of 150 8-second exposures taken on September 5, 2013, starting at 21:25 EST. Barnard’s Star is the brightest star in the image. The telescope is a 10” RC from Ritchey-Chretien Optical Systems. The camera used is a Starlight Express SXV-H9.

Fig. 2. — After aligning the three images based on the background stars, the three images were stacked and then closely cropped around Barnard’s Star. The cropped image was upsampled by a factor of 10 to produce the image shown here. Also shown is the best fit regression line showing the effect of parallax on the proper motion.

By definition, the distance in parsecs is simply the reciprocal of the parallax and so my measured distance to Barnard’s star is 1.57 parsecs. This result is in the right ballpark of the accurately known distance, which is 1.83 parsecs.

The computed parameters were used to make the overlayed sinusoidal plot shown in Figure 2. Clearly, the computed sinusoid passes through the three data points.

The measured proper motion came out to be 18.24 pixels per year, which translates to 10.49 arcseconds per year. This value also matches quite well with the established rate of proper motion of 10.37 arcseonds per year. And, the velocity in arcseconds per year times the distance in parsecs gives the velocity in astronomical units (au) per year. Using our derived numbers we get that the projected velocity is 16.5 au/yr.

Finally, note that in a previous paper Vanderbei and Belikov (2007) made parallax measurements on the asteroid Prudentia and in so doing were able to measure the astronomical unit in terms of Earth radii. We discovered that 1 au = 23,222 Earth radii.

And, in another previous paper, Vanderbei (2008) measured the radius of the Earth by analyzing the compressed reflection of the Sun on the smooth surface of Lake Michigan during a sunset on a calm summer evening. The result so obtained was
1 Earth radius = 5200 miles = 8400 km.

Again, these numbers aren’t terribly accurate but they are in the right ballpark. Anyway, combining these measurements, we see that the distance to Barnard’s star is

1.57 parsec = 1.57 au/arcsec × 3600 arcsecs/degree × 180 degree/π radians
= 3.24 × 105 au
= 3.24 × 105 au × 23,222 Earth radii/au
= 7.52 × 109 Earth radii
= 63.2 × 1012 km.

This final answer is pretty close to the known distance of 56.6 trillion kilometers.

Along the same lines, the proper motion translates to a projected velocity of
16.5 au/yr = 16.5 au/yr × 23,222 Earth radii/au × 8400 km/Earth radius
= 3.30 × 109 km/yr
= 3.30 × 109 km/yr × 1 yr/365.25 days × 1 day/24 hr × 1 hr/3600 sec
= 102 km/sec.

It’s pretty awesome to be able to measure these things with this level of accuracy using modest equipment readily available to amateurs everywhere.

I would like to thank Bill Nagel for sparking my interest in imaging Barnard’s star. He has been taking pictures of it every summer since 2007. Maybe at some point we can use a larger collection of images acquired by a number of AAAP members to compute Barnard’s Star’s parallax and proper motion with significantly better precision than was obtained with the three images described here.

REFERENCES
Vanderbei. The Earth Is Not Flat: An Analysis of a Sunset Photo. Optics and Photonics News, November:34–39, 2008.
Vanderbei and R. Belikov. Measuring the astronomical unit from your backyard. Sky and Telescope, 113(1):91–94, 2007.

This entry was posted in October 2013, Sidereal Times and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

### 1 Response to Observing Barnard’s Star

1. Markus says:

Hi Robert,

i came across your article while searching the web for information about measuring the parallax of nearby stars as an amateur. I am currently preparing myself for starting such measurements. Would you be willing to share the general function for proper motion/parallax, that you used to fit
to your measurements ? You can sent to me in a private message or leave it her as a reply.