From The Director

by Rex Parker, PhD
director@princetonastronomy.org

The Ides of March Approacheth — Yet We Shall Nonetheless Meet.  Shakespeare showed how the Ides of March (mid-month marked by the full moon) were treacherous times for Julius Caesar, but we’ll fearlessly convene at Peyton Hall auditorium on the Princeton University campus on Tues March 11 (7:30pm).  Our guest speaker will be J. Richard Gott III, Emeritus Professor of Astrophysical Sciences at Princeton University.  If you’re a newer member, be aware that due to the continuing campus construction project near Peyton Hall, automobile parking is in the garage at 148 FitzRandolph Rd, accessed from Faculty Rd, giving you a ~10 to 15 minute walk around the stadium to Peyton.  If you just can’t make it physically, this again will be a hybrid meeting via Zoom;  members receive the link by e-mail a few days in advance, and the Zoom link will also be on the AAAP website.  For more information on the presentation and a walking route map to Peyton Hall, see Program Chair Victor’s article below.

Member Rich Sherman will do the Un-journal Club (from his AAAP-tropical abode in Florida) after the break this month.  He’ll talk about his recent trip to famed Kitt Peak observatories near Tucson AZ.  The un-journal club is a monthly tradition where a member gives a brief informal and fun presentation to begin the second half of the meeting.  “Un-journal” means this is not grad school, you don’t need scholarly journal-like topics, just what you care about in astronomy.  PowerPoint slides, JPEG’s, astro-images, travel pictures, book reviews, your imagination is the limit (bring a USB memory stick). To get onto the schedule for an upcoming meeting, please contact me or program chair Victor Davis (program@princetonastronomy.org).

Light Speed and the Invention of Interferometry. The fascinating presentation last month by Kim Burtnyk from the LIGO observatory in Hanford WA got me wondering how interferometry was invented.  A major necessary step was the accurate determination in 1862 of the speed of light by Leon Foucault in France, probably more famous for his pendulum which demonstrated earth’s rotation. Albert Michelson in the US in 1879 refined and improved the method for light speed. By creating robust methods for precisely manipulating light beams through controlled reflection, their apparatus for light speed were keystones in the subsequent invention of the interferometer by Michelson in 1881. In 1907 Michelson became the first American to receive the Nobel prize.  From a wonderful biography, The master of light: A biography of Albert A. Michelson, written by his daughter Dorothy Michelson Livingston, I learned a lot more about the man and the scientist. How he extended and improved upon Foucault’s method and succeeded in accurately determining the speed of light so many decades before electronics were developed is an amazing story. 

Albert Michelson was born in Prussia (now Poland) in 1852 and emigrated to the US with his parents at the age of two. They journeyed across the sea and surmounted dangers in crossing the Panama isthmus years before the canal, settling in a wild west California gold rush town in the Sierra Nevada. Albert’s early promise led to his appointment by President Grant to the Naval Academy in Annapolis in the post- civil war years. It was there that, as an ensign in the Navy, he recreated Foucault’s light speed apparatus. The basis for the method was the measurable displacement of a light beam reflected from a rotating mirror, with calculations using a geometric equation. Of course, it was much harder than that may sound!  In 1862 Foucault obtained c = 298,000 km/sec. Michelson with refined instrumentation obtained c = 299,944 km/sec (186,376 mi/sec), within 0.05% of today’s accepted figure! Accuracy here matters in countless ways for today’s precision electronics and GPS world, for example the meter is determined by the speed of light itself. Delving deeply into the instrumentation Foucault and Michelson figured out in the mid-late 1800’s is a fascinating read. 

Going into the Field.  We’re considering possible destinations for AAAP field trips It’s been years since our private tour of the PPPL in Princeton, and nearly a decade ago a group of us made an unforgettable field trip to D.C. to see the Smithsonian Air & Space Museum and the US Naval Observatory in Washington D.C.  Now we are considering a visit to the other National Air and Space Museum, the Udvar-Hazy Center near Dulles Airport outside.  If you have other proposals for a field trip, we would like to hear about it.   

Posted in March 2025, Sidereal Times | Tagged , | Leave a comment

From The Program Chair

by Victor Davis, Program Chair

Unweaving the Cosmic Web
The March, 2025 meeting of the AAAP will take place in Peyton Hall on the campus of Princeton University on Tuesday, March 11th at 7:30 PM. As usual, the meeting is open to AAAP members and the public. Participants can join the meeting in-person at Peyton Hall or log in to the Zoom session as early as 7:00 pm to chat informally before the meeting begins. The evening’s guest speaker is J. Richard Gott III, Emeritus Professor of Astrophysical Sciences at Princeton University. His talk is entitled “Journey to the Cosmic Web and Back to Earth.”

Options for Attending the Meeting
You may choose to attend the meeting in person or participate via Zoom or YouTube as we’ve been doing for the past few years. (See How to Participate below for details). Due to security concerns, if you log in before the host has set up internet connectivity in Peyton Hall, you may need to wait in the Waiting Room for a few minutes until the host is prepared to admit you into the meeting. You’ll need to unmute yourself to make comments or ask questions. It’s polite, though not required, for you to enable your camera so other participants can see you. The meeting will be recorded and edited for posting to our club’s YouTube channel, but Prof. Gott has asked that we postpone posting the video until he gives the go-ahead.

Speaking Virtually
Prof. Gott will participate via Zoom. There will be no “meet the speaker” dinner this month.

Here’s the anticipated agenda for March’s, 2025’s monthly meeting of the AAAP:

(Times are approximate)

Getting to Peyton Hall
The parking lots across the street (Ivy Lane) from Peyton Hall are now construction sites, unavailable for parking. We’ve been advised by the administration of the astrophysics department that we should park in the new enclosed parking garage off Fitzrandolph street and walk around the stadium and athletic fields. Here’s a map of the campus and walking routes from the parking garage to Peyton Hall. The map shows the recently completed East Garage. Not shown is an access road Sweet Gum that connects from Faculty Road to an entrance at the lower left corner of the garage. Stadium Road connects from Fitzrandolph Road to another entrance at the opposite corner (and higher level) of the garage. It’s about a 10-15 minute walk from the parking garage to Peyton Hall.

J. Richard Gott III
kjrg@astro.princeton.edu

Emeritus Professor of Astrophysical Sciences
Princeton University

“Journey to the Cosmic Web and Back to Earth”

Journey to the Cosmic Web and Back to Earth
Professor J. Richard Gott will tell how his high school science project on spongelike polyhedra led him to a new understanding of the large-scale structure of the universe. If the large-scale structure was seeded by random quantum fluctuations in the inflationary early universe, then the topology of its large-scale structure should look spongelike today. This spongelike structure, with clusters of galaxies connected by filaments of galaxies, has been confirmed many times and is now known as the Cosmic Web. Prof. Gott will also tell how a new kind of polyhedron he discovered recently led him to make (with Goldberg and Vanderbei) the most accurate flat map of Earth yet. It was picked by TIME as one of the 100 best inventions of 2021 and featured on the cover.

J. Richard Gott III
J. Richard Gott is noted for his contributions to cosmology and general relativity.  He has received the Robert J. Trumpler Award, an Alfred P. Sloan Fellowship, the Astronomical League Award, and Princeton’s President’s Award for Distinguished Teaching.  He was for many years Chair of the Judges for the Westinghouse and Intel Science Talent Search.

Born in Louisville, Kentucky in 1947, in high school, he won Second Place in the National Westinghouse Science Talent Search (1965) and First Place in Mathematics in the National Science Fair, St. Louis (1965). He graduated Summa cum Laude in physics from Harvard University (1969) and received his PhD in astrophysics from Princeton in 1973. After postdocs at Cal Tech and Cambridge he returned to join the Princeton faculty where he has remained.  

His paper “On the Infall of Matter into Clusters of Galaxies and Some Effects on Their Evolution” co-authored with Jim Gunn is the most cited astronomy paper published in 1972 (over 4,000 citations).  He proposed that the clustering pattern of galaxies in the universe should be spongelike–a prediction now confirmed by numerous surveys, as described in his book The Cosmic Web (2016). 

In 1982 he was one of the first to suggest that bubble universes could form by quantum tunneling during a period of inflation, producing what we now call a multiverse.  He discovered exact solutions to Einstein’s field equations for the gravitational field around one cosmic string (in 1985) and two moving cosmic strings (in 1991).  This second solution has been of particular interest because, if the strings move fast enough, at nearly the speed of light, time travel to the past can occur.  He wrote an article on time travel for Time magazine as part of its cover story on the future (April 10, 2000). 

Gott and Mario Jurić are in Guinness World Records 2006 for finding the largest structure in the universe: the Sloan Great Wall of Galaxies (1.37 billion light-years long). Gott’s Copernican argument for space colonization was the subject of an article in the New York Times (July 17, 2007).

His new flat, double-sided map projection of the earth (with David Goldberg and Robert Vanderbei) was featured on the cover of Time magazine as one of 100 Best Inventions of 2021.

His book Welcome to the Universe in 3D (2022, with Neil deGrasse Tyson, Michael Strauss, and Robert Vanderbei) was a New York Times #1 Bestseller in Young Adult Nonfiction, reaching #1 on Amazon.com among all books.

How to Participate (Links)
Zoom & YouTube Live
Amateur Astronomers Association of Princeton is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.

Topic: March 2025 AAAP Meeting-J. Richard Gott, Prof Emeritus, Princeton U, A Voyage to the Cosmic Web and Back to Earth
Time: Mar 11, 2025 07:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada)
Join Zoom Meeting

Meeting ID: 813 0450 6946
Passcode: 814730
Meeting link Meeting link
Click the above icons for Zoom and YouTube

Date Featured SpeakerTopic
April 8, 2025Eliot Quataert
Professor of Astrophysical Sciences and the Charles A. Young Professor of Astronomy
Princeton University
quataert@princeton.edu
TBA
May 13, 2025James Stone
Emeritus Professor of Astrophysical Sciences and Emeritus Lyman Spitzer, Jr. Professor of Theoretical Astrophysics
Princeton University
jstone@astro.princeton.edu
TBA
June 10, 2025Jacob Hamer
Assistant Curator
NJ State Museum Planetarium
Jacob.Hamer@sos.nj.gov
Dr. Hamer has expressed his intention to continue AAAP’s tradition to host the June meeting at the planetarium of the NJ State Museum in Trenton. The meeting will feature a presentation of the planetarium’s current sky show, a live planetarium tour of the night sky, and a guest speaker presentation.
July-AugustNo monthly meetings
Sept. 9, 2025Edwin L. Turner
Emeritus Professor of Astrophysical Sciences
Princeton University
elt@astro.princeton.edu
TBA
Oct. 14, 2025Becka Phillipson
Assistant Professor in Physics
Villanova University
rebecca.phillipson@villanova.edu
TBA
Thanks to Bill Thomas for suggesting this speaker.
Nov. 11,
2025
Romain Teyssier
Professor of Astrophysical Sciences and Applied and Computational Mathematics
Princeton University
teyssier@princeton.edu
TBA

As always, members’ comments and suggestions are gratefully accepted and much appreciated. Thanks to Ira Polans and Dave Skitt for setting up the online links and connecting the meeting to the world outside Peyton Hall.

victor.davis@verizon.net
program@princetonastronomers.org
(908) 581-1780 cell

Posted in March 2025, Sidereal Times | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

From the Assistant Director

by Robert Vanderbei, PhD  assist.director@princetonastronomy.org

The Star Party Event at the Institute for Advanced Study.  On Friday, February 21, 2025, there was an evening star party event at the Institute for Advanced Study (IAS) here in Princeton NJ.   Lia Medeiros started hosting these events once per year back in 2020.  In those first few years, she was an NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellow at the IAS.   It is her passion to reach out to the broad public, and especially young kids, about astronomy.   At each of these star party events, she has given a 30-minute talk about astronomy mostly aimed at inspiring an interest in astronomy to the kids in the audience.   At this year’s event, the talk was at 5:30pm in a building right next to the large green lawn behind the IAS’s main building (aka Fuld Hall).

The star party was announced to everyone associated with the IAS.   Because the room for the talk had a fixed number of seats (250), registration was required to attend Lia’s talk.   The stargazing part of the event was outdoors and open to the public.   I did not attend Lia’s talk since I needed some time to set up my telescope.  Because I didn’t attend, I can’t give any details about the talk but Lia did tell me that the room was full.   There were 250 registered attendees most/all of whom spent some time stargazing with us after the talk.

I was only one of about 10 astronomers (most of whom are AAAP members) who brought a telescope to the event.   I don’t remember all the folks who helped out with the event but here’s those that I think were there… 

Bill Funcheon,  Bill Murray,  Dave Wilton,  Gaspar Bakos,  Gene Allen,  George Wong, Hongkun Zhao,  Jeffrey Beck,  Karry Lam, Ron Geck,  Sihao Cheng, Siming Ji,  Todd Spencer,  Victor Davis, Vivek Vijayakumar, and me.

Most of them are AAAP members.

Here’s some of the things we pointed our telescopes at:  Mars, Jupiter, Venus, the Andromeda Galaxy (M31), the Pleiades (M45), the open clusters M36, M37, M38, the Horsehead and Flame nebulas.   As part of the event, David Wilton got some nice pics taken with his Dwarf II telescope.   Here they are…

The deep sky and the earthlings…

  • The Andromeda Galaxy
  • The Horsehead and the Flame
  • The Pleiades
  • Gaspar Bakos' long exposure of Polaris directly over Fuld Hall.
  • Stargazing at IAS
  • Flame & Horsehead, DwarfII- 71x8 sec for 9 min, 28 sec. Credit: Dave Wilton
  • Andromeda Galaxy, DwarfII-274x8 sec for 36 min, 32 sec. Credit: Dave Wilton
  • Pleiades, DwarfII-201x8 sec for 26 min, 48 sec. Credit: Dave Wilton
Posted in March 2025, Sidereal Times | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Minutes of the February 11, 2025 Meeting

by Gene Allen, Secretary

Director Rex Parker opened the meeting on Zoom at 1935. There were 44 attending on Zoom. He pointed out the upcoming launch of the SPHEREx orbiter on February 26 and reviewed the line up of planets in the night sky. He shared a few astrophotos of southern deep sky objects that he captured from a remote telescope he operates in Chile and then his agenda for the business meeting.

Rex expressed kudos and appreciation to Treasurer Michael Mitrano for having served the AAAP faithfully and well in that role for the past 18 years. Michael intends to retire and has asked to be replaced, so we are now seeking someone with an accounting background and experience with Quickbooks to step into that position.

Program Chair Victor Davis introduced our speaker for tonight, Kimberly Burtnyk, the LIGO Laboratory Technical Editor and Web Content Director. She has been on staff there for 11 years, and gave us a virtual tour of the facility. Her presentation detailed how the observatory equipment works and what it has discovered since its first gravity wave detection in 2015. After her talk she fielded questions for 25 minutes and then took her camera into the control room of the facility for a 20 minute tour where she had the operators offering explanations and fielding questions. There were 50 attending on Zoom throughout her talk.

The tour finished at 2123 and Rex launched right into the business meeting without a break.

Outreach Chair Bill Murray reported that we now have 10 volunteers to support the IAS Star Party on Friday, February 21, but with 100-200 attendees expected, more telescopes are needed. Cloud dates are the preceding night of February 20 and February 23.

Rex explained that High Point Scientific had acquired stock from bankrupted companies Meade, Orion, and Coronado, and would be making them available at 40-60% discounts over the next few weeks.

An appeal was made for a member who is or was an educator to design and coordinate an astronomy program for young students. He or she would get help to put the program into use.

Observatory Co-Chair Dave Skitt reported that Keyholder Training would resume in March, depending on the weather. Since Co-Chair Jennifer Skitt has been less available lately, Bill Murray offered to assist Dave with the training. The 2025 Keyholder Duty Schedule will be published soon.

Our stalled Loaner Scope Program needs both a facilitator and some storage space somewhere handy in which the collection can be organized and from which scopes can be distributed. The observatory is overly crowded already, and trying to add a shed of some sort in the park would be a long and likely unsuccessful effort. Repurposing the vacant Nature Center building is not a valid prospect and the house on the corner of Bear Tavern and 546 is uninhabitable, as are the barns next to the soccer fields. Dave reported that, for example, a 10×10 storage unit at a facility nearby on Reed Road costs $169/month without climate control, $189 with. The question was raised about the prospect of available space on Princeton University.

The meeting was adjourned at 2200. Attendance on Zoom decreased from 35 to 28 during the business meeting.

As of February 8, we have 213 active members. So far in CY2025, renewals number 18 and expirations number 11, giving us a 62% retention rate. We have added 3 new members.

Submitted by Secretary Gene Allen
February 14, 2025

Posted in March 2025, Sidereal Times | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

AAAP Board Meeting Minutes February 5, 2025

by Gene Allen, Secretary

A brief meeting was convened on Zoom at 1930. The session was not recorded.
In attendance were:

Rex reported that Michael Mitrano intends to retire, so we are seeking a replacement for his position of Treasurer. An accounting background and familiarity with Quickbooks is strongly desired, but none of us are aware of any potential candidates. He consulted with Leslie Kuchinski, Operations Director of Hopewell Valley Friends of Open Space (FoHVOS), who is a PhD astronomer and experienced in accounting. She recommended looking into Givebutter non-profit fundraising software. That prompted Ira to propose that we move to the NSN site which has provisions for managing membership and dues payments. Dave seconded that, and Mike praised the Club Express software used by the 300 member Delaware Valley Astronomers, which inherently interfaces directly with Quickbooks. Gene objected that we are discounting the work done over the past year by the New Website Committee and Member Jeff Pinyan who has volunteered to personally code it, saving us thousands. Apologies ensued, accompanied by complaints that they have no idea what is going on with the new website build and that our lack of a program for elementary students is a major failing. An appeal for candidates will be sent to the membership.

Commensurate with Michael’s retirement, he and Rex discussed returning to a universal membership year to greatly simplify the jobs of Treasurer and Secretary. It was only in 2022 that the Board decided to change from a universal year to the current system of a personal year based on when someone joined or last paid. The previous Secretary resigned over that change two years ago. Rex reported that we have a $30K balance and suggested considering elimination of dues altogether. Instead, we would just have a fund drive every other year. Discussion that followed came to something of a consensus that if we do retain membership dues, they would be due in January each year. Anyone who joined during January through June would pay the full amount, and anyone joining July through December would only be expected to pay half. There was no discernable consensus on whether to have dues or fund drives, and no action was taken.

Rex proposed purchasing a Celestron EdgeHD 14 telescope and an ASI2600MC Duo camera with some of our money. The Edge 14 can lock its mirror if an external Crayford focuser is added, and it could be used for both visual and camera observing. The Crayford needs to be set to its middle position and the scope focused with the primary focus, which moves the mirror. Then the mirror is locked and the Crayford is used to fine tune the focus.

Curiously, Tom Swords discovered that the C14 currently in the observatory, which already has an external Crayford focuser installed, also has a device installed to enable locking the mirror. It was purchased from an astrophotographer who had installed a Software Bisque C14 Locking Collar but left it unengaged. It would require some really long hex wrenches to lock the mirror on this scope, much less convenient than on the Edge 14, but doable. The problem would be trying to use it for visual observing, when the Crayford is unlikely to have enough range to accommodate focusing diverse eyepieces.

Michael Mitrano has been in contact with the appropriate personnel in the state park system, and reports that there is no assurance that our lease will be renewed when it expires in 2027. It has been just okay residing on state property. Approval of any changes is onerous and their maintenance of gates and roadways has been almost nonexistent. If we are forced to relocate, it would mean essentially building another observatory from scratch. That would likely require a grant of some sort. For grants one must usually demonstrate some benefit to the public. Mention of a former Western Electric site in Mount Rose. The comment was made that we must pay close attention to maintaining protected surroundings. We will try to investigate potential sites.

Victor has reissued the Gene Ramsey Memorial Plaque design with the photo upgraded by member Rich Sherman and will order it soon from Woodland Manufacturing. Discussion ensued about possibly renaming the observatory for Gene, as almost none of us remember what John Simpson did for the club all those years ago. The comment was made that naming an observatory for a person ties it to that era. Rather than change the name every few years, it is better to not give it a person’s name. We will henceforth minimize “Simpson,” referring to it simply as the AAAP Observatory.

With the engineering complex on the Princeton University campus towering over Peyton Hall, the demise of our longtime home seems imminent. Retired PU Professor Bob Vanderbei has no specific knowledge of the timeline but thinks destruction or rebuilding is 3 or 4 years out. He agreed to approach department head Michael Strauss to see what he can learn. Dave’s company is getting involved in the construction on campus and may be able to get a handle on the timeline. Somebody, somewhere, is the project manager and has a predicted date, whether or not it holds. Discussions were progressing on a move to the IAS when we were invited back to Peyton Hall. The current remote parking has proved to be a significant impediment to in-person attendance, while parking and the auditorium facility at IAS are clearly far superior. Rex will reconnect with member Lee Sandberg who holds a position at the IAS to see if discussions can be resumed.

Over the past several years we have accumulated a number of telescopes intended to be loaned to members, but none have ever been made available. Most are cluttering Dave’s house and those kits that have been assembled get cannibalized for various purposes. Storage is a big issue. There is none in the observatory and adding a storage building there would be great but once again it would take years to get state approval, if it were even possible. Mike pointed out that Delaware Valley only rents their scopes. A suggestion was made that we rent a storage unit nearby, perhaps at a facility on Reed Road. We also need to identify a facilitator for the program.

The meeting was adjourned at 2125.

Submitted by Secretary Gene Allen
February 7, 2025

Posted in March 2025, Sidereal Times | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Glitches Gloomy

by John Church

This is not directly related to astronomy, but since many of our speakers rely on Macs and sometimes have compatibility issues with our system, Here is a parody on Longfellow’s “Hiawatha” that I included in one of my books some years ago.   I recall with some anguish the trials and tribulations that all of us confirmed Mac users had to go through when our employer made us switch to Windows computers.  

Enjoy, or not !  Maybe some readers of Sidereal Times will have similar stories.

Mr. Longfellow and Other Plagiarists.
– Title of essay by Edgar Allan Poe

Somewhere deep in Central Jersey,
In a green and pleasant valley,
Near a turnpike legendary,
With its famous numbered exits,
Stood an office center thriving;
Filled it was with Macintoshes,
Now with mass extinction threatened
By the Windows, opening, closing;
Helpless, they who toiled there daily,
To their loved computers clinging,
Rumors of destruction hearing
From the Master Cloner’s empire.

So, in ancient cemetery,
Sought they aid of Wadsworth Henry;
Not to be confused with Wordsworth,
Though their names had certain likeness;
Wads of chewing gum exhausted,
Henry’s tombstone decorating,
Certified a laureate worthy.
As they asked for help poetic,
Lo! his specter thus responded:

“Well I taught them, how to clone,
But now forever shall they moan!
I’ll haunt them all with old Nokomis,
Raised from tomb in Oklahomis;
Fling magnetic curses boundless,
Rendering their speakers soundless;
Fill their drives with glitches gloomy,
Throw them all in Gitche Gumee!
Viruses shall be injected,
Applications be infected;
Then, by spyware all corrupted,
Browsing constantly disrupted,
And by pop-ups interrupted,
Shall their systems suffer crashes,
Shall their e-mails turn to ashes,
Sent to bulging cans of trashes;
Back into their chambers turning,
All their souls within them burning,

Cubicles forever spurning,
Nevermore to be returning!
– True, some lines may sound familiar,
For my passing’s made me sillier;
Other cloners I despise,
But sometimes I still plagiarize!”

And the grateful Macintoshers
Uttered cries of heartfelt blessings:
“Honor be to Wadsworth Henry!
May your name now be exalted,
Other copycats be faulted!”

Posted in March 2025, Sidereal Times | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Methods for Measuring Neutron Star Parameters: A Comprehensive Review

by Rees W. Morrison

What celestial object is so densely compact that a teaspoonful of it would weigh as much as Mount Everest (800 trillion kilograms last time it stepped on the scales)?  What object has a gravitational force that is 100 billion times stronger than Earth’s (you’d have to zip along at one-third the speed of light to escape the star)?  And what if you knew that the diminutive object has a diameter of the 11 miles from Peyton Hall to the center of Trenton, yet even so it whirls its mass of one and a half Suns (yes, you read that correctly) more than 100 times every second?  Such a hard-to-believe object would be one of nearly 4,000 known neutron stars.

Did I say that neutron stars are awesome and fascinating?

They are the left behind remnant of a star of between eight and 20 or so solar masses that runs out of fissionable fuel and suffers the almost instantaneous collapse of its iron core.  That implosion triggers a colossal supernova, with the 20-kilometer remnant that consists mostly of neutrons blazing away at over a 100 billion degrees Kelvin (compared to the Sun’s comparatively frigid surface of 10,000 degrees Fahrenheit, and its tepid core of only 27 million degrees Fahrenheit).  Topping it all off, its magnetic field (“magnetosphere” to fans) exerts the force of 1 trillion gauss – that’s 300 million times stronger than a sunspot, enough to pull atoms apart if something were to approach the neutron star.

Now, that’s a lot of metrics.  How in the world (or out of this world) do astrophysicists calculate those mind-boggling figures? The answer to that question, or at least an excellent start, can be found in a recently published review on arXiv:  Stefano Ascenzi, Vanessa Gaber and Nanda Rea, Neutron-star Measurements in the Multi-messenger Era, (Jan. 2024) https://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.14930

Based at space research institutes in Spain or Italy, the authors start with a lucid overview of what is known today about neutron stars from electromagnetic radiation, neutrinos and gravitational waves.  Following that introduction, they carefully and clearly explain “a schematic overview of the different techniques used to study these extreme objects and how reliable these approaches are.”  Over the next 28 pages they tackle the methodologies behind inferring eight important neutron-star measurements.  In addition to the mass, radius,  compactness, and magnetic field of neutron stars (in general, as there are eight-to-ten varieties of such stars), they also cover moment of inertia (a measure of how resistant the neutron star is to changes in its rotational motion, involving its mass, how far the surface of the star is from its center, and how the mass is distributed), tidal deformity (when a neutron star orbits another star or black hole and gravity distorts the neutron star), the crust (which is on the order of 10 billion times stronger than steel and sometimes ruptures as an unimaginable starquake), and superfluidity (inside the star the material flows with zero viscosity, meaning without losing kinetic energy).    

The authors explain the strengths and weakness of several methods to calculate or infer each of the measurements.   And their synoptic review adds more: they explain which energy levels – gamma rays, X-rays, radio waves, etc. contribute to the data and calculations.  Finally, they present their views on how much the method depends on the so-called “equation of state” selected by the researcher.  Equations of state integrate the density, pressure and temperature of a neutron star, and there are scores of them that make different assumptions or cut-off points. 

 The table below states the measurement in the “Measurement” columns and in the “Method” columns several methodologies based on observables (like we can observe the spectrum and the spin rate of neutron star that beams at us – a pulsar) and how those observables produce inferred values.  In alphabetical order, the acronyms are BH = black hole; CBM = compact binary merger; GRB =  gamma-ray burst  ; GW = gravitational waves;  NS = neutron star; and QPO = quasi-periodic oscillation.

The authors acknowledge that “fully covering the extensive literature on this topic is beyond the scope of this review”, but they cited an impressive 633 references!  Among them are more than 30 reviews, which are the best way to survey and plunge into a specific topic.

At the end of their opus, the authors summarize what they have done – and reiterate the theme of this article:

The study of [neutron stars] presents fascinating opportunities for scientific exploration. These compact objects, characterized by strong gravity, high densities, large magnetic fields and fast rotation, offer insights into the properties of matter and strong interactions under extreme conditions that we cannot replicate in terrestrial environments. However, as I demonstrated in this review, measuring the characteristics of [neutron stars] and using these to constrain dense-matter physics is a challenging task.

PS: Rees would be very pleased to talk about neutron stars and related topics with any interested reader. He can be reached at rees@reesmorrison.com

Posted in March 2025, Sidereal Times | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Grasping Time: The Lifespans of Cosmic Objects

by Abhinav Sukla

Most of us will only be around for less than a century. With a lifespan that short, even the times of ancient civilizations feel unimaginably far away. When the frame of reference shifts to cosmic objects, the sheer scale of their age and longevity is completely unfathomable. There is little difference between a million, a billion, and a trillion years to someone who will live for less than 100. To better understand the differences between these numbers, we can use the classic example of equating one year to a second. 1 million seconds is about 12 days, while a billion seconds is almost 32 years. 1 trillion seconds is close to 32 millennia, over 10% of the total time humans have existed for. With this in mind, we can look at the lifespans of all sorts of cosmic objects with a comprehensive idea of just how long they will be around. 

The Sun:
The Sun is a G-type star, or yellow dwarf. These kinds of stars typically last a few billion years before they run out of hydrogen to fuse for energy, as it all fuses into helium. The gravitational forces will win for a moment, contracting and heating up the core of the Sun, resulting in more nuclear fusion in order to fight these forces, expanding the outside of the star drastically. Once the helium runs out, the star will slowly fade away, losing mass until it becomes a white dwarf.

Red dwarfs:
Red dwarfs are stars that are less massive, cooler, and smaller than our Sun, and consequently live much longer, up to 10 trillion years. When these stars run out of hydrogen fuel, most swell just as our Sun does, and they also collapse into white dwarfs once they run out of helium.

White dwarfs:
When a star collapses and becomes a white dwarf, it still has a staggering 10 trillion years or more left to live. White dwarfs are small, about the size of a city, but hold up to half the mass of the Sun, making them one of the densest objects in the universe. Because the gases are far more densely concentrated, these stars are extremely hot, around 10^5 degrees Celsius. Eventually, however, their heat radiates away, and they turn into black dwarves at the end of their lives, the longest lasting objects in the universe.

Black holes:
From here on out, the numbers begin to get a little fuzzy. The total number of years that every single human to ever exist has lived isn’t even close to a trillionth of a thousandth of a percent of the lifespan of a blackhole. Black holes were once thought to be eternal, but it was fairly recently discovered that they actually lose mass through a process called Hawking radiation. This happens when energy fluctuations near the edge of a black hole create a particle and antiparticle pair. Quantum mechanics states that space is never truly empty, which is what allows for the temporary creation of these pairs using “borrowed” energy from the black hole. Normally, these particles will annihilate each other, returning the borrowed energy. However, if the particle with positive energy escapes while the one with a negative energy density is consumed by the black hole, the black hole will lose mass(since e=mc^2). Hawking radiation is a painstakingly slow process, which is why it takes around 10^100 years for a decent sized black hole to finally die. Even this astronomical amount of time, however, pales in comparison to the lives of black dwarfs.

Black Dwarfs:
The universe is not nearly old enough to house any black dwarfs, but much is theorized about their existence and functions. Black dwarfs are extremely cold, close to absolute zero(-273°C). Their fusion is extremely weak, hardly enough to fight against the crushing gravity of these massive objects. When atoms are packed as tightly as they are in a black dwarf, the nuclei begin to press so close together that they no longer have a hold on their individual electrons. The matter inside of a black dwarf looks like multitudes of these nuclei pressed tightly together, with all of their electrons moving around between them. Because these electrons have the same charge, they repel each other, and as the gravity of the star pushes them closer together, the repulsive electromagnetic forces increase drastically in magnitude due to Coulomb’s law. It is this electromagnetic force that holds up black dwarfs. Their downfall comes about when these electrons begin to disappear. In order to understand how this happens, we must first understand how fusion occurs in general. Normally, overcoming the repulsive forces between two positively charged nuclei requires a large amount of energy, which even the Sun’s core is not hot enough to provide. However, due to the particle-wave duality of particles, there is a small chance that protons overcome these energy barriers between them, making fusion much more likely and powering stars for billions of years. When fusion occurs, a proton often has to be converted into a neutron in order to stabilize the new atom, which releases positrons, the antimatter particle of electrons. These positrons then go and annihilate the closest electrons. In normal stars, this is of little concern, but it is a crucial part of the deaths of black dwarfs. At absolute zero, this process still happens, but at a miniscule fraction of the pace. Two particles may fuse every trillion years or so, but when they do, positrons are released, and they detract from the overall number of electrons in the star. Since electrons are the ones holding up the black dwarf, each time fusion occurs, the electrons are pushed more tightly together as they begin to lose the battle against gravity. After around 10^1000 years, there are too few electrons to support the weight of the star, and it collapses in on itself in a violent explosion. These explosions will mark the end of light in our universe as it descends into darkness forever, nothing more than a cesspool of random particles in the far, far future. 

The incredible timescales of cosmic evolution stretch far beyond human comprehension. From the relatively short-lived existence of G-type stars like our Sun to the near-eternal life spans of black dwarfs and black holes, the lives of these objects unfold over periods that make human existence seem like a mere blink in comparison. Even the most enduring celestial objects, black dwarfs, will eventually succumb to the still mysterious forces of quantum mechanics rendering our universe dark and empty forever.

Posted in March 2025, Sidereal Times | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A lot from “almost nothing”

by S. Prasad Ganti

“There is plenty of room at the bottom” exclaimed the Nobel Prize winning Physicist Richard Feynman. He was referring to the room in the atoms. The nucleus is very tiny, about ten thousand times smaller than the orbits of the electrons which circle the nucleus. With the nucleus containing the neutrons and the protons. All known matter consists of atoms, which means that there is a lot of “almost nothing” at the microscopic level. Yet, matter, which includes us, and our earth and our possessions, and the whole Universe, is very significant

Moving to higher scales, there are wide gaps between the planets of our solar system. The distance of each planet from the next increases as we go further away from our Sun. The first four planets Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars are relatively closer to the Sun and each other. But still the space around and between them is vast. Yet the rocky planets of the inner solar system are very significant. 

Followed by the asteroid belt which contains the remnants of the formation of our solar system. It looks like hundreds of thousands of pieces of rubble forming a solid band. But, in reality, there are huge gaps from one piece to another. To the extent that we cannot visually see the neighboring pieces if we were to stand on one of them. 

The distances to the outer gaseous giants Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune increase as we go outward. The rings of Saturn consist of hundreds of thousands of pieces of rubble, appearing as a solid band. But there is a wide gap between each of them. Like in the asteroid belt, if we were to stand on one such piece, we cannot see the neighboring pieces. This means that our solar system, like the nucleus in the atom, is made up of “almost nothing”. The volume of planets and the sun is a miniscule fraction of the whole spanning space. Yet, this “almost nothing” is very significant. 

Beyond the solar system, there are vast gaps between the stars. Our nearest star Proxima Centauri is about four light years away, with a vast interstellar space in between.  Similarly for other stars within our galaxy, the Milky Way. Yet, the galaxy is a very significant structure.

The space between galaxies itself is huge. For example, our neighboring galaxy Andromeda is about 2 million light years away. The intervening space is “almost nothing”. At a macroscopic level, the cosmic web of our Universe itself consists of islands of clusters of galaxies separated by vast spaces in between. And the Universe is expanding. With galaxies moving away from each other at a rapid pace.   

The vacuum of space represents absence of matter, but it is posited that pairs of virtual particles are constantly getting created and destroyed, leading to energy which drives the expansion of the Universe. “Almost nothing” is significant indeed!

Coming back to the earth, most of the human body is made of water which is pretty mundane, if not “almost nothing”. Very little is made of biochemicals. Yet, it is a very significant design.

The gigantic scales of the universe are built on “almost nothing”.  A lot, in fact, is riding on “almost nothing”. Finally, this article itself may amount to “nothing”. 

Posted in March 2025, Sidereal Times | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Gravitational Waves: Everywhere, All the Time

by James Peck

I thought Kim Burtnyk’s Feb. 11th talk was fascinating and it got me thinking about the nature of the universe. These are just some musings from an amateur scientist that may seem batty, but some ideas from theoretical physicists seem batty to me, so I guess we are even.

Black holes, billions of light years away from us accelerate and cause gravitational waves that we can pick up here on earth at the two LIGOs. So I’ll extrapolate that every object with mass that accelerates anywhere in the universe creates gravitational waves. Although their effects are tiny and we can only measure the ones that fall within the sensitivity of our instruments they are nonetheless there, and everywhere, at all times.

So I’ll agree with people like John Muir and Leonardo da Vinci who, along with others, said basically that if you try to pick out anything by itself you find it’s connected to everything else. So space-time is not an empty void with some objects randomly spread around in it, but more like a clear jello vibrating from all the invisible activity of the myriad of waves passing through it and affecting everything in it.

Since there are so many of these waves moving randomly everywhere, that because of the mathematical law of large numbers, they converge into a standing wave that constantly jiggles the entire universe. Kind of like the experiment when you put sand on a tabletop and then vibrate the table and watch the sand move around and eventually settle into a fixed vibrating pattern; like a visual representation of sound called cymatics.

Maybe that vibrating energy is what causes the quantum effect of objects coming into existence and then disappearing all throughout space. Maybe it helps cause Brownian motion in particles, and it’s why particles don’t lose their energy. Maybe it’s what causes the strings in string theory to vibrate. So the universe would have some kind of a vibrating hum that might, through random variations, change slowly over the millennium, causing some unexplained things like the acceleration of the universe’s expansion, or eventually a collapse into a big crunch.

Just as a final comment I would like to say that one of my joys in life, besides the normal human ones like love, family, work, kindness etc. (and the astronomy club), is to ponder the wonder of what’s all around us. I agree with Ralph Waldo Emerson who said, ” The world (universe) is so beautiful that I can hardly believe it exists.” 

Posted in March 2025, Sidereal Times | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment